Rybczynski Theorem


1. Factor Growth

Growth in a recession

During a recession, resources are not fully utilized. Proper economic policies may be used to stimulate economic growth. (US, Germany before WWII) German unemployment rose to about 30% in 1932.

Similarly, when resources are not mobile within an economy, infrastructure investment may increase mobility and stimulate economic growth (e.g., China, Roman Empire, US after WWII)

Neutral growth The supply of a factor grows over time. Capital and labor skills grow rapidly in LDCs than in the US. How does factor growth affect international trade and welfare of trading countries?

          Production: Factor growth may increase the output of both the exportable and the importable by the same rate. This kind of growth is called neutral growth.

          For example, if K and L grow by 5% (^K = ^L = 5%), then neutral growth occurs because both the outputs of the exportable and the importable grow by the same rate.

Ultra-export biased growth

          If the production of the exportable grows faster than that of the importable (^y1 > ^y2 > 0) it is called export-biased growth.

          If the output of the exportable increases and that of the importable decreases (^y1 > 0 > ^y2) the growth is ultra-export biased.

Ultra-import biased growth is similarly defined. The following figure shows neutral, import biased, export biased, ultra export biased and ultra import biased growth.

 war

Instead of shifting outward, sometimes it is possible for the PPF to contract inwards. For instance, during World War II, significant amounts of resources were diverted away from civilian production to produce defense goods.

 Remarks The growth of a factor does not necessarily increase the output of every good.

The growth of a factor does not necessarily increase exports. Figure 2 shows that export may decline, if a consumption bias exists.

Figure 17

 Small country For a small country, factor growth always increases national income and welfare (because growth does not affect prices)
 Immiserizing Growth

 If the terms of trade deteriorate sufficiently, growth can be immiserizing, lowering income and welfare.

miserari = to pity in Latin.

immiserize = to become poorer, pitiful.

   Figure 18. Immiserizing Growth

 

3. Rybczynski Theorem

Assumption

Output prices are held constrant. Accordingly, factor prices are fixed.

This deals with growth of a small open economy.

input-output coefficients remain constant.

Rybczynski Theorem Labor growth increases the output of the labor-intensive industry and decreases the output of the other industry (L and the L-intensive industry are friends.)
 resource constraints

1. The relationship between input and output

aL1 y1 + aL2 y2 = L, (i.e., L1 + L2 = L)

aK1 y1 + aK2 y2 = K. (i.e., K1 + K2 = K.)

The aij's depend on w and r, not fixed as in Ricardian model.

2. The Rybczynski Theorem

         The above equations show that the sum of the inputs used in the two industries must add up to the nation's input supplies.

(L1,K1) + (L2,K2) = (L,K).

This relationship between inputs and outputs are shown below.

An increase in the endowment of labor increases the production of labor intensive good and decreases the production of the other good (capital intensive good). The cone of diversification can be used to illustrate Rybczynski Theorem in the output spac e. An increase in the endowment of one factor results in either an ultra-export or import biased growth.

Figure. The Rybczynski Theorem


 Rybczynski effects  
   

4. The Magnification Effect

   An increase in labor endowment increases the output of labor-intensive good more than proportionately.

You may skip this proof.

aL1 y1 + aL2y2 =L,

aL1Δy1 + aL2 Δy2 = ΔL

= aL1 y1 (Δy1/y1) + aL2 y2 (Δy2/y2).

 Intuition  divide both sides by L

^L = λL1 ^y1 + λL2 ^y2.

where λL1 = aL1 y1/L = L1/L = the percentage of labor forced employed in industry 1.

This shows that the percentage change in labor is a weighted average of the growth rates of the two outputs. That is, labor growth lies somewhere between the two output growth rates, ^y1 and ^y2.

If both outputs grew at the same rate, say 10%, then labor demand would also grow by the same rate. However, by the Rybczynski Theorem, the output of one industry actually declines. This implies that the other industry must grow more than proportionately. That is, if labor grows by 10%, one industry declines but the other industry must grow more than 10%. This is the intuition behind the Magnification Effect.

For example, assume that labor shares of two industries are equal (50%) and that labor supply rises by 10% and the capital-intensive industry contracts by 5%. the above equation reduces to:

10% = (1/2)^y1 + (1/2)(-5%).

Even when industry 2 does not contract, output of the labor intensive industry must expand 20% ( which is more than 10%). Since the capital-intensive sector declines, industry 1 has to grow even faster to offset this negative effect.

 Exercises 1. Using the iso-unit cost curves, evaluate the impacts of an increase in the price of a labor intensive good to returns to capital and labor. Restate the Stolper-Samuelson theorem and the magnification effect.

2. Evaluate the effects of an increase in the endowment of capital on the production of labor intensive and capital intensive goods. Restate the Rybczynski Theorem and its magnification effect.

 
 
Washington National Gallery

Cultural Impacts of Trade

What is this cardinal showing off in this portrait?

After the fall of Constantinople in 1453, many intellectuals left Constantinople and moved to other cities of the Byzantine Empire, where they were well treated. About the time (1517) when Martin Luther pegged the ninety five theses on the church door of Wittenburg, the church became rich. To educate the ignorant public, the church needed paintings. Commissions to pain religious subjects stimulated the development of Western art, especially painting.

Venice became the trade center, and together with Florence (banking center) provided financial support for the Renaissance.

 

 Proof  But if you insist on proof, it is given below.

λL1 + λL2 = 1.

^y1 - ^L = (1 - λL1) ^y1 - λL2 ^y2 = λL2 (^y1 - ^y2) > 0.

Remark: If both outputs, y1 and y2, were to increase 10%, labor demand would also increase 10%. However, by the Rybczinski theorem, an increase in labor decreases the output of the capital-intensive good, y2. Since y2 is declining, in order to effect a 10% growth in labor force, output of y1 must increase by more than 10%, hence a magnification effect.