|
Quinn WeningerAssociate Professor |
|
Vitae |
I am an Associate Professor of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics in the Department of Economics at Iowa State University. My research uses economic theory and econometric methods to understand and improve the management of natural resource-based industries. Much of my work examines the impacts of market-based approaches for managing ocean commercial fisheries. Recent research projects focus on multiple-species fisheries, decision making under uncertainty, bycatch, and rent dissipation under rights-based management programs. Recent PapersFleet restructuring, rent generation and the design of
individual transferable fishing quota programs: Empirical evidence
from the pacific coast groundfish fishery. Marine Resource Economics,
24 (2010): 329-359, with Carl Lian and Rajesh Singh (recipient of the
Dr. S.-Y. Hong Award for Outstanding Article in Marine Resource
Economics) download
pdf Bio-Economies of scope and the discard problem in
multiple-species fisheries, Journal of Environmental Economics and
Management, 58 (2009): 72-92, with Rajesh Singh download
pdf Benefits of management reform in the Gulf of Mexico grouper fishery: A semi-parametric analysis, Resource and Environmental Economics, forthcoming download pdf Search and active learning with correlated information: evidence from Mid-Atlantic clam fishermen, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32 (2008): 1921-1848, with Philippe Marcoul download pdf Fisheries management with stock growth uncertainty and costly capital adjustment, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52 (2006): 582-599, with Rajesh Singh and Matthew Doyle download pdf Meetings with costly participation: an empirical analysis, Review of Economic Studies, 72, Number 1 (January 2005): 247-268, with Matthew Turner download pdf Economic benefits of management reform in the northern Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, Issue 2, (September 2003): 207-230, with James A. Waters download pdf
Working PapersTrading frictions and fishery discards download pdf This paper studies harvest uncertainty in a fishery that is
managed with tradable quotas. We show that eliminating trading
frictions in quota markets can eliminate at-sea discards that occur due
to random catch-quota imbalance. In general, discards and the cost of
harvesting a fixed quota increases with trading costs. As an
alternative, when trading costs are unavoidable, we deduce an
ad-valorem tax/subsidy that can eliminate discards while delivering a
desired harvest target. These results have important implications for
quota program designs, which often limit quota trades to address
ancillary management objectives. Markov-Perfect rent dissipation in rights-based fisheries download
pdf Information Sharing and Cooperative Search in Fisheries download
pdf This paper studies equilibrium search and learning in a
dynamic fishing game that is played by independent fishermen and by
members of an information sharing cooperative. Once collected,
information about the location of productive fishing sites is an
excludable public good. We show that independent fishermen do not
internalize the full value of information and do not replicate
first-best search patterns. An information sharing cooperative
faces a free-riding problem as each member prefers that another
undertake costly search for information. Contracts can be written to
improve upon free-riding, however they may create ineffcient search
relative to the first-best. The results explain why information
sharing cooperatives are rare in fisheries and provide insights for
the regulation of fisheries.
It is oftern argued that individual transferable quota (ITQ) management programs are not well-suited for multi-species fisheries. An often cited but unverified problem is that randomness in harvest creates mismatches between catch and quota holdings. To comply with regulations, fishermen may choose to discard overages at sea, creating additional management problems. The discard problem can be magnified if fishermen must balance catches and quotas across multiple species. In response to this concern, ITQ program designs often include some form of quota-balancing scheme, designed to counter the discard incentive when catch-quota mismatch occurs. We introduce a model of a stochastic, multiple-species harvest technology to study discard incentives under various quota-balancing schemes currently used in ITQ fisheries. We show that most schemes, all but a provision that allows frictionless post harvest quota trades, can create unintended effects. Relative to a standard ITQ design, some quota balancing schemes likely increase at-sea discarding. The reason is that quota balancing schemes introduce post-harvest management flexibility for fishermen, which tends to raise the ex post value of the stochastic catch. Fishermen optimally respond by increasing the ex ante allocation of factor inputs. Increasing inputs lowers the costs associated with a catch realization below the quota, i.e., a catch underage. The response also increases the likelihood of overages and discards. A second unintended effect of added management flexibility is loss of management control over harvest and discards in the fishery. With added flexibility, fishermen adjust the expected mix of harvested species to maximize profits. We show under popular quota balancing mechanisms, harvests and discards depend in complex ways on the array of prices, quota issued by managers, and operating rules. Our analysis characterizes the performance of various quota balancing schemes. We then derive the properties of a first best ITQ design for a multiple-species fishery.
Halibut ProjectSEARCH, LEARNING AND DYNAMIC CHOICE UNDER UNCERTAINTY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ALASKAN HALIBUT FISHERMEN This goal of the 'Halibut' project is to provide new empirical
knowledge about how people form expectations about uncertain events
that affect their lives, and how people process and learn from new
information. During the 2006 and 2007 west coast commercial halibut
fishing seasons our research team recorded individual fishermen beliefs
about the catch and weather uncertainty they face, and choices made
about where and when to fish. The data is being used to develop tests
of competing theories of decision-making, learning and search under
uncertainty. The results are expected to make important
contributions to the fields of behavioral
economics. The followng document provides an overview of the study goals and the data that were collected download pdf. Additional results are expected in the fall of 2011.
Personal InformationI was born and raised in Kelowna, British Columbia which is
located in the Okanagan Valley. My education and
career has taken me through Alberta, Alaska, Maryland, Utah, Washington
State, and Iowa. Elizabeth and I were married in 1995 and we have two
great kids.
|